Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 6:46:54 GMT
The tough. External links to other sites isnt specifically a ranking factor but it can bring value to your content and that in turn can be relevant for us in search. Whether or not they are followed doesnt really matter. That is a hard hard statement to interpret. The first sentence says External links. We dont use them. Theyre not a ranking factor. The second sentence says But those links might bring value to your content and that in turn can be relevant for us in search which almost seems to contradict the first sentence.
Those two things dont go together. I think this statement was not from Greece Mobile Number List Garry. This is John Mueller I think said this one. Whether or not they are followed doesnt really matter. Okay so if you are using them followed or not followed doesnt matter. Tough statement to interpret. Im not sure what to take away from that. The only thing I think I might be able to do is to say I should probably test it. I should figure it out for myself. Recommendations for analyzing and interpreting Googles words In fact Ive got some recommendations for you when you are analyzing these words from.
Google because it can be really tough to say How do Which one is the external links statement Which one is the Ill go check and Ill tell you which one is the flatout wrong statement Which one is the Well maybe this is right but maybe its just not telling me the whole story. A Consider all the ways that the statement could be true while the surfacelevel info is technically wrong. So for example on the external links one maybe the statement is true that its not specifically used as a ranking factor or not separately used but maybe its used in concert with other signals. Thats what was trying to be said there by.
Those two things dont go together. I think this statement was not from Greece Mobile Number List Garry. This is John Mueller I think said this one. Whether or not they are followed doesnt really matter. Okay so if you are using them followed or not followed doesnt matter. Tough statement to interpret. Im not sure what to take away from that. The only thing I think I might be able to do is to say I should probably test it. I should figure it out for myself. Recommendations for analyzing and interpreting Googles words In fact Ive got some recommendations for you when you are analyzing these words from.
Google because it can be really tough to say How do Which one is the external links statement Which one is the Ill go check and Ill tell you which one is the flatout wrong statement Which one is the Well maybe this is right but maybe its just not telling me the whole story. A Consider all the ways that the statement could be true while the surfacelevel info is technically wrong. So for example on the external links one maybe the statement is true that its not specifically used as a ranking factor or not separately used but maybe its used in concert with other signals. Thats what was trying to be said there by.