Post by account_disabled on Dec 19, 2023 9:45:18 GMT
Ase, by activating the software, there is the possibility to limit or even permanently restrict certain functions and options for the new buyer should the product be offered for sale again. This not only harms the interests and rights of the new owner but also affects those of the trader who will find it much more difficult to sell the product in this condition or at the same starting price . Maybe this aspect is less known, but there is the possibility to check the authenticity of an electronic device even without opening/starting the device, by simply accessing the respective manufacturer's website, by entering the IMEI series we can check and find out in just a few minute essential aspects about the current state of the device (if it has been used before, respectively activated, if it is within the warranty period offered byeven the location history).
The IMEI series is written in most cases even on country email list the box of the device, so in this situation, the contractual clause exposed by the merchant receives legal value and cannot be considered illegal because it protects the commercial rights and interests as well as those of other consumers as long as they exist an alternative device authentication option. What is debatable would be precisely the lack of additional information from the merchant, I think it would be preferable not only to specify what is prohibited but also to indicate the alternative options that the user/customer can use to prevent such unpleasant situations but for subjective reasons this is very unlikely to happen. The user also cited reasons related to the aesthetic appearance of the product, respectively requested the.
Full return of the amount of money due to the fact that there is a scratch imperceptible with the naked eye on the device case. In this situation we refer to art. ( ) of the Civil Code relating to the condition of the goods sold, which stipulates the obligation of the buyer to check the condition of the goods, immediately after taking over, but we must mention that, accepting a return on this basis would in principle remain strictly at the discretion of the merchant, since the right warranty of these categories of products covers only defects of a technical nature (hardware or software) that prevent the user from using the product to its true potential or that may expose him to a danger that may affect his life, health or bodily integrity. In this situation the conditions to benefit from the warranty right were not met and the product was not changed because the software was activated.
The IMEI series is written in most cases even on country email list the box of the device, so in this situation, the contractual clause exposed by the merchant receives legal value and cannot be considered illegal because it protects the commercial rights and interests as well as those of other consumers as long as they exist an alternative device authentication option. What is debatable would be precisely the lack of additional information from the merchant, I think it would be preferable not only to specify what is prohibited but also to indicate the alternative options that the user/customer can use to prevent such unpleasant situations but for subjective reasons this is very unlikely to happen. The user also cited reasons related to the aesthetic appearance of the product, respectively requested the.
Full return of the amount of money due to the fact that there is a scratch imperceptible with the naked eye on the device case. In this situation we refer to art. ( ) of the Civil Code relating to the condition of the goods sold, which stipulates the obligation of the buyer to check the condition of the goods, immediately after taking over, but we must mention that, accepting a return on this basis would in principle remain strictly at the discretion of the merchant, since the right warranty of these categories of products covers only defects of a technical nature (hardware or software) that prevent the user from using the product to its true potential or that may expose him to a danger that may affect his life, health or bodily integrity. In this situation the conditions to benefit from the warranty right were not met and the product was not changed because the software was activated.